USPTO serial 75779082
SOLAR CAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2678515Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 21, 2003
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SOLAR CAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Marionville, MO
MISSOULA, MT
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Marionville, MO
Chicago, IL
Marionville, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES P MURAFF
JAMES P MURAFF Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP2 North LaSalle StreetChicago, IL 60602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable electronic publications, namely, fiction books, nonfiction books in the field of science, newsletters and booklets in the fields of ecology and energy; and downloadable electronically delivered photographs in the field of science, namely, ecology and energy | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 14, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Botsford, Diana Dru
- Other trademarks owned by CORRICK, STEPHEN K.
- Other trademarks owned by Corrick, Stephen K.
- Other trademarks owned by Corrick, Stephen K.
- Other trademarks owned by Botsford, Diana Dru
- Other trademarks owned by Corrick, Stephen K.
- Other trademarks owned by Botsford, Diana Dru
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SOLAR CAFE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 23, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 31, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |