Drawing for CZARINA

USPTO serial 75779177

CZARINA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CZARINA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Narendra Reddy Thappeta

NARENDRA REDDY THAPPETA LAW FIRM OF NAREN THAPPETA39899 BALENTINE DR STE 119NEWARK, CA 94560UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic hardware, namely, set-top boxes providing interconnection between televisions and global computer networks to enable viewers to purchase products and services on global computer networks via televisions; integrated circuits for televisions to provide interconnection between televisions and global computer networks to enable viewers to purchase products and services on global computer networks via televisions; and computer operations software for set top boxes and integrated circuits for use in providing interconnection between televisions and global computer networks to enable viewers to purchase products and services on global computer networks via televisionsACTIVE
035Online retail services featuring electronic goods, books, general merchandise, music, toys and games, apparel, groceries, and automobiles accessed via global computer networks and television sets and providing online directory information services also featuring hyper-links to other web sites featuring retail servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Nov 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 1, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Feb 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 23, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 30, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 10, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 2, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 23, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2001ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
Dec 26, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Nov 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 9, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance