USPTO serial 75779288
CHANNELINX.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHANNELINX.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Vick, Jr.
JOHN E VICK JR DORITY & MANNING PAP O BOX 1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and sale of products by way of electronic commerce on the internet, including the sale and procurement of building materials and building supplies in electronic commerce | ACTIVE | Jun 16, 1999 |
| 037 | Network installation services for enabling electronic commerce in the field of building materials and supplies, petroleum-related chemicals, industrial equipment and supplies, manufacturing equipment, and construction equipment and supplies | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software maintenance services for enabling electronic commerce in the field of building materials and supplies, petroleum-related chemicals, industrial equipment and supplies, manufacturing equipment, and construction equipment and supplies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |