USPTO serial 75779358
BRAAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRAAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nils H. Ljungman
NILS H LJUNGMAN NILS H LJUNGMAN & ASSOCIATESP O BOX 130GREENSBURG, PA 15601-0130UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METALLIC BUILDING MATERIALS, NAMELY, METALLIC COVERINGS FOR ROOFS AND BUILDINGS, METALLIC GUTTERS, AND METALLIC PANELS AND SECTIONS FOR BUILDINGS; METALLIC PANELS; AND METALLIC SECTIONS FOR BUILDINGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | SHEETS, RODS, FILMS, ROPES, AND STRIPES MADE FROM PLASTIC MATERIALS POLYMERIZED BY IONIZATION FOR USE IN MANUFACTURING IN THE FOLLOWING INDUSTRIES - TRANSPORTATION, AERONAUTICS, AEROSPACE, SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, AND ELECTRONICS; HIGHLY POLYMERIZED PLASTIC MATERIALS, NAMELY, SHEETS, RODS, FILMS, ROPES, AND STRIPES | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | NON-METALLIC BUILDING MATERIALS, NAMELY, PLASTIC CASES FOR ROLL SHUTTERS AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR, VENEER WOOD, MOLDABLE WOOD, WOOD PANELING, WINDOW FRAMES, DOOR FRAMES, TILES FOR BUILDINGS, TILE FLOORINGS, WINDOW CASES, AND DOOR CASINGS; VENEER WOOD; MOLDABLE WOOD; WOOD PANELING; PANELING; WINDOW FRAMES; DOOR FRAMES; TILES; FLOORINGS; AND FLOORS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lafarge Braas GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Lafarge Braas GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named BRAAS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 15, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |