USPTO serial 75779363
CON MET& DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CON MET& DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David P. Petersen
DAVID P PETERSEN KLARQUIST SPARKMAN CAMPBELL ET ALONE WORLD TRADE CTR STE 1600121 S W SALMON STPORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | HAND HELD TOOLS FOR USE IN INSTALLING AND REPAIRING WHEEL HUBS, NAMELY WHEEL PULLERS FOR REMOVING BEARINGS AND WHEEL PULLERS FOR REMOVING WHEEL HUBS | ACTIVE | May 31, 1999 |
| 012 | WHEEL HUBS FOR LAND VEHICLES AND TRAILERS, BRACKETS FOR LAND VEHICLES, FUEL WATER SEPARATORS FOR LAND VEHICLE MOTORS AND ENGINES, BRAKE DRUMS, AND WHEEL HUB SERVICE KITS, NAMELY A KIT CONTAINING BEARINGS, SPACER, SEAL, GREASE AND SNAP RINGS, STRUCTURAL FOAM PLASTIC PARTS FOR LAND VEHICLES, NAMELY, DOOR PANELS, OVERHEAD COMPARTMENTS, AND VEHICLE DASH ASSEMBLIES | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |