USPTO serial 75779400
THE FIGHT CHANNEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE FIGHT CHANNEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, hats, t-shirts, pullovers, sweaters, training boots and shoes, head bands, sweat suits and jackets | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely, conducting informative and instructional conferences, lectures, classes and workshops in the fields of professional and amateur fighting and athletic competition, physical fitness, self defense, mental health, junior development, senior citizen healthcare and exercise, and consumer awareness | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |