USPTO serial 75779631
INTERCEPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTERCEPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kelly Cummings, Esq
PATENT & LICENSING DEPARTMENT ONDEO NALCO COONDEO NALCO CTR1601 W DIEHL RDNAPERVILLE, IL 60563-1198Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Corrosion inhibitors in the nature of a liquid chemical compositions used in refinery and petro chemical processes | ACTIVE | May 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 12, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 12, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |