USPTO serial 75779785
MISSISSIPPI RIVER FOUNDATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MISSISSIPPI RIVER FOUNDATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephan Land McDavid
STEPHAN LAND MCDAVID MAYO MCDAVID PLLC428 N LAMAR BLVDPOST OFFICE BOX 1456OXFORD, MS 38655-1456Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Services specified-- 1) To promote and provide funding to facilitate the protection, restoration, enhancement, understanding, awareness, and sustainable use of the natural resources and environmental resources of the Mississippi River 2) To provide funding to The Lower Mississippi River Conservation Committee to restore habitat to benefit the natural resources of the Mississippi River 3) To increase the level of awareness by the public regarding the natural resources of the Mississippi River 4) To develop a membership base for support 5) To encourage sustainable use of the Mississippi River s natural resources for long-term environmental, social, and economic benefit | ACTIVE | Jun 29, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |