USPTO serial 75780600
PURCHASEIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PURCHASEIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. McElwaine
JOHN C MCELWAINE NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLPP O BOX 1806CHARLESTON, SC 29402-1806UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for rapid implementation of automated procurement and businesses management processes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 17, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 17, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |