USPTO serial 75780720
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary C. Cannon, Esq.
CHARLES H KNULL VANESSA RIVIERE MARC ULLMAN, SHAPIRO & ULLMAN LLP299 BROADWAY STE 1700NEW YORK, NY 10007UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin care preparations, namely skin creams and lotions; skin creams and lotions containing colostrum; topical skin sprays; non-medicated lip balms; hair care preparations, namely shampoos and conditioners | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Dietary supplements; nutritional supplements; dietary and nutritional supplements containing colostrum; nutraceuticals for use as a dietary supplement; nutraceuticals for the treatment of diarrhea, ulcers, arthritis, joint inflammation, candida infection and bacterial infections; nutritional drink mixes for use as a meal replacement; the foregoing not intended for infants or small children | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | yogurt containing colostrum; dairy-based beverages containing colostrum; the foregoing not intended for infants or small children | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | ready-to-eat cereal based snack food bars; ice milk; ice cream and frozen yogurt containing colostrum; mixes for making ice milk, ice cream and frozen yogurt; the foregoing not intended for infants or small children | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 29, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |