USPTO serial 75780738
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LORNE R POLGER
LORNE R POLGER PROCOPIO CORY HARGREAVES & SAVITCH LLP53 B ST STE 2100SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4469UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Wholesale distributorship and mail order catalog services featuring military items and artifacts manufactured in the former Soviet Union and other Eastern block countries, in the nature of timepieces, optics, collectibles, historic collectibles, coins, stone porcelain gifts, dolls and gift shop type items | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |