USPTO serial 75780925
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Indianapolis, IN
Indianapolis, IN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Orlesia Hawkins
ORLESIA HAWKINS AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP816 CONGRESS AVE STE 1900AUSTIN, TX 78701-2478UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR INTEGRATING, MANAGING, AND DISPLAYING GRAPHICS AND INFORMATION FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER CONSULTING; PROVIDING DATA INTEGRATION SERVICES FOR COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, INTEGRATING COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS AND COMPUTER CONSULTATION VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 19, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |