USPTO serial 75780928
Serial No. 75780928
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 75780928?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORM D. ST. LANDAU
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP NORM D ST LANDAU1500 K ST N WSTE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | MEN'S, WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, SWEATERS, SUITS, SPORTS JACKETS, TOPCOATS, DRESSES, PANTS, COATS, JUMPSUITS, VESTS, T-SHIRTS, BLAZERS, RAINCOATS, PONCHOS, CAFTANS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEAT PANTS, JERSEYS, TUNICS, BLOUSES, SKIRTS; SKIWEAR, NAMELY; SKI JACKETS, SKI PANTS, SKI SUITS, ONE-PIECE SKI SUITS; SWIMWEAR, NAMELY, SWIMSUITS; UNDERWEAR AND LINGERIE NAMELY, UNDERWEAR TOPS AND BOTTOMS, SHORTS, PYJAMAS, ROBES, STOCKINGS, HOSIERY, PANTYHOSE, PANTIES, BRASSIERES; FASHION ACCESSORIES NAMELY, SCARVES, HATS, BELTS, GLOVES, TIES; FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, SHOES, BOOTS, SANDALS, SLIPPERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |