USPTO serial 75780935
PROLOCATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROLOCATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW P BRIDGES
ANDREW P BRIDGES WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI PC650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | communication services, namely, providing telecommunications connections to a global computer communications network; electronic transmission of messages, data and documents; providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, hosting the web sites of others on a global computer network; technical consulting services in the fields of computers, computing and network communications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |