USPTO serial 75780993
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Palos Verdes Estates, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Francie R. Gorowitz
FRANCIE R GOROWTIZ O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP1999 AVE OF THE STARSSTE 700LOS ANGELES, CA 90067| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing high bandwidth fiber optic network services to medium and large sized businesses in the entertainment industry, which enable them to create, produce, edit and distribute various entertainment and media products | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |