Drawing for MEDIA.NET COMMUNICATIONS

USPTO serial 75780993

MEDIA.NET COMMUNICATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDIA.NET COMMUNICATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Francie R. Gorowitz

FRANCIE R GOROWTIZ O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP1999 AVE OF THE STARSSTE 700LOS ANGELES, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Providing high bandwidth fiber optic network services to medium and large sized businesses in the entertainment industry, which enable them to create, produce, edit and distribute various entertainment and media productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 18, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 18, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 18, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 21, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 31, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 31, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 20, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Apr 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 20, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 19, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance