Drawing for ORPHAN MEDICAL

USPTO serial 75781056

ORPHAN MEDICAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BRIAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORPHAN MEDICAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven R Baird

STEPHEN R BAIRD WINTHROP & WEINSTINE, PASTE 3500225 S SIXTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005HOUSEMARK FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE PREVENTION, TREATMENT, AND AIDING IN THE TREATMENT OF HUMAN AND ANIMAL CONDITIONS, ILLNESSES, AND DISEASESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 6, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 29, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 23, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 27, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 27, 2004GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 7, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 19, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 19, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 3, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 24, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance