USPTO serial 75781135
NEW YORK MUSIC AWARDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 24, 2002
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NEW YORK MUSIC AWARDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Hazard, Jr.
JOHN W HAZARD JR WEBSTER, CHAMBERLAIN & BEAN1747 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | providing educational programs, namely school programs and seminars in the field of music | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 3, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |