USPTO serial 75781421
FABULOUS FOREVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3197814Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 16, 2007
- Examiner
- OTT, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FABULOUS FOREVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. Ambrogi
John L. Ambrogi Partridge IP Law P.C.321 North Clark StreetSuite 720Chicago, IL 60654Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Body and facial scrubs; body lotions; moisturizing skin lotions; facial lotions; anti-wrinkle creams and lotions; wrinkle removing skin care preparations; hand lotions; body creams; hand creams; facial creams; shaving gel; after-shave lotions; after-shave moisturizing creams; bath and shower gels; skin cleansing preparations; hair shampoos; hair conditioners; hair lotions; make-up removers; personal deodorants; suntan lotion preparations; sunscreen preparations; sun block preparations; non-medicated lip balms; aromatherapy skin lotions; carrier oils; massage oils; foot lotions; facial masques; facial and body skin firming preparations; pore size reducing preparations; creams and lotions for cellulite reduction; non-medicated preparations for pain relief; non-medicated preparations for preventing the growth of skin tags | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Anti-itch preparations; anti-inflammatory preparations; anti-congestion cold, flu, and sinus treatment preparations; menstrual symptom treatment preparations; anti-infective preparations for parasite infections; acne treatment preparations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Processed nuts; nut and fiber crunch toppings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Grain, nut and seed based confections, namely, mock chocolates; breakfast cereals; grain and vegetable based breakfast bars; grain, nut and seed based snack bars; breads; muffins; cookies; English muffins; cakes; madeleines; pancakes; biscuits; crackers; pizza dough; pizza crust; biscotti; herbal food beverages; ice cream | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mignault, Lorraine
- Other trademarks owned by Mignault, Lorraine
- Other trademarks owned by Mignault, Lorraine
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named FABULOUS FOREVER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 9, 2006 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |