Drawing for NORTHERN OUTWEAR

USPTO serial 75781752

NORTHERN OUTWEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NORTHERN OUTWEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas J. McEvov

DOUGLAS J MCEVOY GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE, ANDERSONPO BOX 70212701 TROY CTR DR STE 330TROY, MI 48007-7021

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025WEARING APPAREL, NAMELY T-SHIRTS, PANTS, SHIRTS, HATS, CAPS, COATS, VESTS, SOCKS, AND SHOESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 23, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 23, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 23, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 25, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 27, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 20, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 23, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance