USPTO serial 75781831
FAIR TRADE CERTIFIED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FAIR TRADE CERTIFIED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW J. FERREN
ANDREW J FERREN GOULSTON & STORRS PC400 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02110-3333UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | honey and orange juice | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |