Drawing for ORANGE ZEST

USPTO serial 75782067

ORANGE ZEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORANGE ZEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Cold PreparationACTIVEJun 5, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 15, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 29, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 29, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 15, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 25, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 14, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 15, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 26, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 20, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 2, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 18, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 13, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 30, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance