USPTO serial 75782210
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
60318 Frankfurt am Main, DE
FRANKFURT AM MAIN, DE
60318 Frankfurt am Main, DE
60318 Frankfurt am Main, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Sacoff
ROBERT W SACOFF PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY ET AL311 S WACKER DR STE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DATA PROCESSING PROGRAMS FOR ELECTRONIC TRAVEL-RESERVATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | TRAVEL AGENCY SERVICES, NAMELY, MAKING RESERVATIONS FOR BOOKINGS FOR TRANSPORTATION AND PROVIDING SUCH TRAVEL INFORMATION AND TRAVEL-RELATED DATA VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | DESIGN OF DATA PROCESSING COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR OTHERS FOR ELECTRONIC TRAVEL HOTEL RESERVATIONS; TRAVEL AGENCY SERVICES, NAMELY, MAKING HOTEL RESERVATIONS AND BOOKINGS AND PROVIDING SUCH TRAVEL INFORMATION AND TRAVEL-RELATED DATA VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2005 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 2, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |