USPTO serial 75782253
MEDIA-WISE FAMILY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDIA-WISE FAMILY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil F. Markva
NEIL F MARKVA8322-A TRAFORD LNSPRINGFIELD, VA 22152UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting conferences, seminars, workshops, lectures, and classes rendered to Bible-believing, God-fearing Americans and Christians regarding the manner in which content of the news and entertainment media may be evaluated from a Biblical perspective and distributing materials in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 18, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |