Drawing for BRENNTAG STINNES LOGISTICS

USPTO serial 75782264

BRENNTAG STINNES LOGISTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2722954Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 10, 2003
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRENNTAG STINNES LOGISTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HERBERT DUBNO

HERBERT DUBNO CUSTOMER NUMBER 535THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS, PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE BOX 900BRONX, NY 10471-0900

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Binding agents sold as a component of paintsSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDMar 19, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2005C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Mar 2, 2004AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Jun 10, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 24, 20031.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Apr 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2003IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jan 30, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2002EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 20, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 28, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 8, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 6, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 31, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 5, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance