Drawing for BRENNTAG STINNES LOGISTICS

USPTO serial 75782265

BRENNTAG STINNES LOGISTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRENNTAG STINNES LOGISTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HERBERT DUBNO

HERBERT DUBNO CUSTOMER NO 535THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS, PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE BOX 900BRONX, NY 10471-0900

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Common metals and their alloys, namely, tool steel and stainless steel, ferrochrome, cadmium, aluminum, magnesium, cobalt, nickel, zinc, copper, pig iron for use in the chemical, engineering, electronics, electrical, semi-conductor, microchip, nuclear, optical, refractory, aerospace, medical, metallurgical, mining, glass, ceramic, photography, printing, agricultural, horticultural, forestry, commercial and residential building, construction, automobile, automotive, insulation, packaging, engineering, energy, electronics, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, fragrance, textile, leather, synthetic rubber, health care, food, paint, mold making, semi-conductor, microchip, and terrestrial photovoltaic industriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 19, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 3, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 13, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 17, 200244DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED—
Sep 13, 200244DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED—
Sep 13, 200244DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED—
Sep 11, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 31, 200244EDSEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED—
Jul 31, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2001CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 15, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 5, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance