Drawing for E-STAR

USPTO serial 75782525

E-STAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with E-STAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David R. Haarz

DAVID R HAARZ DICKINSON WRIGHT, PLLC1901 L ST N WSTE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036-3510

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017plastic in the form of film and sheets for general industrial use, excluding use in the manufacture of photographic filmACTIVEApr 20, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2001OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 13, 2001OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Aug 13, 2001ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 6, 2001OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 12, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 10, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 4, 2000AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 8, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance