USPTO serial 75782525
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
DONG SUNG CHEMICAL IND. CO., LTD.
Pyungtaik-city Kyungki-do, KR
DONG SUNG CHEMICAL IND. CO., LTD.
Pyungtaik-city Kyungki-do, KR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David R. Haarz
DAVID R HAARZ DICKINSON WRIGHT, PLLC1901 L ST N WSTE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036-3510| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | plastic in the form of film and sheets for general industrial use, excluding use in the manufacture of photographic film | ACTIVE | Apr 20, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |