Drawing for UNCLE BEN' S MEAL MAKERS

USPTO serial 75782536

UNCLE BEN' S MEAL MAKERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNCLE BEN' S MEAL MAKERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy J. Kelly

TIMOTHY J KELLY FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Rice, rice mixes and prepared entrees featuring riceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 26, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 25, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 1, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 10, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 19, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 30, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 30, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 29, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 30, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance