USPTO serial 75782589
CENTERMATIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2757810Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 2, 2003
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CENTERMATIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
3155 PD Maasland, NL
3155 PD Maasland, NL
3155 PD Maasland, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Penrose Lucas Albright
PENROSE LUCAS ALBRIGHT MASON MASON & ALBRIGHT2306 S EADS STP O BOX 2246ARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Agricultural machines for use in dairy farming, namely, milking machines and replacement parts therefore; machine parts therefore, namely, valves, fluid conduits, pistons and cylinder vessels, and pumps; robots for use with said machine; milking apparatus and computer controlled robots used with said apparatus, namely, apparatus for automatically weighing agricultural materials, controlling application rates, and automatically calibrating to compensate for discrepancy in material due to inconsistency of material and weather conditions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Equipment and instruments, namely, milk quality and quantity measuring sensors for measuring, regulating, controlling and monitoring agricultural machines, milking machines and automated robots for use with said machines; computer software for processing, storing and presenting data for use with agricultural machines, milking machine and automated robots used with said machines and machine tools, namely, software and machine tools for measuring and controlling application rates of agricultural material, weighing material, calculating and displaying coverage and compensating for discrepancy in material due to inconsistency of material or weather conditions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 11, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |