USPTO serial 75782688
WHITE CLOUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2995440Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2005
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WHITE CLOUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Boca Raton, FL
Boca Raton, FL
Boca Raton, FL
Boca Raton, FL
Boca Raton, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAKE D. FELDMAN
Paper Partners, Inc.Suite 5255200 Town Center CircleBoca Raton, FL 33486Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | full line of personal care products, namely, bath foam, bath gel, bath oil, body cream, soap, deodorants, facial cleansers and creams, hair cleaning preparations, hair conditioners, hair rinses, non-medicated body soaks, essential oils for personal use, hair shampoo-conditioners, shower gel, skin cleansers, skin cleansing cream, skin cleansing lotion, skin cream, skin emollients, skin lotion, all excluding foot powder, other foot care products, nail polish, nail polish remover, diapers and incontinence products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 27, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Paper Partners, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by WHITE CLOUD MARKETING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Paper Partners, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Paper Partners, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Paper Partners, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named WHITE CLOUD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2017 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| May 27, 2016 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| May 27, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 15, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 1, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 31, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 28, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 25, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |