Drawing for DUCKWORTH'S FOOD MARKETS

USPTO serial 75782719

DUCKWORTH'S FOOD MARKETS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2633442Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 8, 2002
Examiner
CARTY, GEORGIA
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with DUCKWORTH'S FOOD MARKETS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert N. Blackmon

Robert N. Blackmon Merek, Blackmon & Voorhees2301 N. Powhatan St.Alexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING CONVENIENCE STORE ITEMS AND GASOLINESECTION 8 - CANCELLEDAug 29, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2013CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Nov 16, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 29, 20078.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Oct 16, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Oct 9, 20078.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Oct 9, 2007ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 30, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Jun 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2002R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
May 8, 2002CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Apr 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 14, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 26, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 17, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance