Drawing for ESP

USPTO serial 75782740

ESP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ESP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arlen L. Olsen

ARLEN L OLSEN SCHMEISER, OLSEN & WATTS22 CENTURY HILL DR STE 302LATHAM, NY 12110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Conducting classes, seminars, and individualized instruction in the field of psychological methodologies of learning and facilitating how to develop the psychological habits for success therefrom; distribution of course materials in connection therewithACTIVEAug 31, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 12, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 12, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 11, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 11, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 8, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 31, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 6, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 22, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 23, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance