Drawing for MYOFFICE

USPTO serial 75782745

MYOFFICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MYOFFICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sally M. Abel

SALLY M ABEL ESQ FENWICK & WEST LLPSILICON VLY CTR801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware, computer software, namely, office productivity software, personal productivity software, electronic messaging software, workgroup software, scheduling software calendaring software, project management software, word processing software, spreadsheet software, graphics software presentation software, math formula software, browser software, web page design software, multimedia software, electronic newsgroup software, computer networking software, communications software, computer operating system software, computer software for testing compatibility of computer software, computer software for computer emulation, computer software for electronic mail, computer software for creating graphical interfaces, document processing software, computer security software, computer software for developing, compiling and executing other computer software, computer software for navigating, browsing, transferring information, and distributing and viewing other computer programs, on computers, computer networks and global computer networks, computer software downloadable from global computer networks; computer peripherals; and user manuals supplied as a unitACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 9, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Oct 8, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Oct 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 30, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Apr 22, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Apr 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 30, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 24, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 24, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 30, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 29, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 14, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 4, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance