USPTO serial 75782757
PUCK PALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PUCK PALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PITTSBURGH, PA
PITTSBURGH, PA
WILKES-BARRE SCRANTON HOCKEY ASSOCIATES
Wilkes-Barre, PA
Other trademarks owned by WILKES-BARRE SCRANTON HOCKEY ASSOCIATES
WILKES-BARRE SCRANTON HOCKEY ASSOCIATES
Wilkes-Barre, PA
Other trademarks owned by WILKES-BARRE SCRANTON HOCKEY ASSOCIATES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alana M. Fuierer
ALANA M FUIERER THE BILICKI LAW FIRM, PCFURNITURE MART BLDG STE 1000111 W SECOND STJAMESTOWN, NY 14701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, HATS, COATS, HOCKEY SHIRTS, ATHLETIC WEAR, NAMELY, SHORTS, SWEATPANTS AND ATHLETIC SHOES, SOCKS; T-SHIRTS, AND SWEATSHIRTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WBS HOCKEY, LP
- Other trademarks owned by WBS HOCKEY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by WILKES-BARRE SCRANTON HOCKEY ASSOCIATES
- Other trademarks owned by WILKES-BARRE SCRANTON HOCKEY ASSOCIATES
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named PUCK PALS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 14, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 27, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |