USPTO serial 75783011
BLINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3307658Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 9, 2007
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
El Segundo, CA
El Segundo, CA
Sherman Oaks, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brett E. Lewis
BLINK.COM, INC.2101 ROSECRANS BLVDSUITE 2000EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining, data on a global computer network | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hyperzap, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BLINK.COM, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BLINK.COM, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BLINK.COM, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BLINK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2010 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 2010 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |