USPTO serial 75783093
VERTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VERTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD L. MYERS
RICHARD L MYERS APPLIED MEDICAL RESOURCES CORPORATION22872 AVENIDA EMPRESARANCHO SANTA MARGARITA, CA 92688UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | THERMOPLASTIC ELASTOMERS PROVIDING A HYDROPHILIC COATING SOLD AS AN INTEGRAL COMPONENT OF SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |