USPTO serial 75783119
OXFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OXFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rod S Berman
JEFFREY C WHITLEY U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL INC2727 N CENTRAL AVEPHOENIX, AZ 85004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | LIFE INSURANCE UNDERWRITING, CRITICAL ILLNESS INSURANCE UNDERWRITING, MAJOR MEDICAL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING, INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION, INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION, INSURANCE CLAIMS PROCESSING, ADMINISTRATION OF EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS, FINANCIAL SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF ANNUITIES, ANNUITY UNDERWRITING, ADMINISTRATION OF ANNUITIES AND FINANCIAL PLANNING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |