USPTO serial 75783245
OPENHIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPENHIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Berliner
ROBERT BERLINER FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI, LLP865 S FIGUEROA ST 29TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING ON-LINE RECRUITMENT MANAGEMENT, NAMELY, PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF RESUMES AND A LISTING OF EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES TO JOB SEEKERS, EMPLOYERS, AND RECRUITERS; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE FEATURING INFORMATION ABOUT EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES AND RESUMES OF JOB SEEKERS, AND DISSEMINATING RESUMES OF OTHER AMONG JOB SEEKERS, EMPLOYERS, AND RECRUITERS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |