USPTO serial 75783289
BEDFORD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEDFORD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles Hieken
CHARLES HIEKEN FISH & RICHARDSON PC225 FRANKLIN STBOSTON, MA 02110-2804UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Decorative vertical textiles; namely, acoustical panels for vertical surfaces for buildings sold to the commercial interiors market through a distribution network of professionals who are with interior designers, facility managers and contractors in their respective markets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |