Drawing for ARTEMIS

USPTO serial 75783295

ARTEMIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARTEMIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donna M. DeGrandi

ERIN S HENNESSY TIME WARNER INCONE TIME WARNER CTR 14TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10019-8016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016PRINTED MATTER AND PUBLICATIONS; NAMELY, BOOKS AND MAGAZINES FEATURING SHEET MUSIC, MUSIC MANUSCRIPT PAPER AND INFORMATION RELATING TO THE MUSIC INDUSTRY, COMPOSERS, MUSICAL ARTISTS, RECORDINGS AND PERFORMANCESACTIVE—
035MUSIC LICENSING SERVICESACTIVE—
041MUSIC PUBLISHING SERVICES; MULTIMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING INFORMATION RELATING TO MUSIC, COMPOSERS, MUSICAL ARTISTS, RECORDINGS AND PERFORMANCES, AND THE MUSIC INDUSTRY, WITH REPRODUCTION OF SOUND AND IMAGES, VIA GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS AND TELEVISION RECEIVERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 12, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2003PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Sep 5, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
May 23, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2001IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Mar 27, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 2, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 1, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 31, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance