USPTO serial 75783478
DYNAMIC POWER CANADIAN FUND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DYNAMIC POWER CANADIAN FUND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario M5H 4A9, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SANDRA COVINGTON
SANDRA COVINGTON COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | MANAGING MUTUAL FUNDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DUNDEE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Dundee Bancorp Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named DYNAMIC POWER CANADIAN FUND
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |