Drawing for POCKET DOCTOR

USPTO serial 75783547

POCKET DOCTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POCKET DOCTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael S. Harris

MICHAEL S HARRIS THE THOMSON CORPORATION1 STATION PLSTAMFORD, CT 06902UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Hand-held computer containing a database of drug and medical information for daily practice use by physiciansACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2001ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Dec 19, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 17, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 18, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance