Drawing for SCIENCE FOR LIFE

USPTO serial 75783637

SCIENCE FOR LIFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCIENCE FOR LIFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HARRY G THIBAULT

HARRY G THIBAULT PE APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS850 LINCOLN CTR DRFOSTER CITY, CA 94404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Installation, maintenance, and repair of nucleic acid sequencers and synthesizers, genetic analyzers, fragment analyzers, electrophoresis machines, linkage analyzers, genetic mappers, laser scanners, mass spectrometers, liquid, chromatographs, laboratory workstations which include computers used for sample preparation and screening, laboratory robots, computer hardware for biotechnology research and related analysisACTIVE—
042Installation and maintenance of computer software for biotechnology research and related analysis; DNA analysis; synthesis of oligonucleotides and other molecules for biotechnology research and related analysis; chemical analysis in the nature of inventory control of chemicals for biotechnology research and related analysis; consultation, research and development in the fields of science, pharmaceuticals, health and nutrition and public policy related to biotechnology; Research and development in the field of medicine and biotechnology; gene discovery; genetic disease research; genomics and gene expression research and development; computer services, namely, providing on-line electronic databases on global computer networks in the field of medicine, health and nutrition, and their related law and public policy areas; Providing temporary use of on-line nondownloadable software for accessing and managing database in the field of biotechnology, medicine, health and nutrition, and their related public policy areasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 8, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 8, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 9, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 9, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 9, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 8, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 1, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 1, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 21, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 18, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 12, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 12, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 13, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 13, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2002TCALTEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB—
Jun 25, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 28, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 8, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 6, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance