USPTO serial 75783645
ECOGROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3107139Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 20, 2006
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ECOGROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
82041 Oberhaching, DE
82041 Oberhaching, DE
82041 Oberhaching, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KARL F MILDE JR
KARL F MILDE JR MILDE HOFFBERG & MACKLIN LLP10 BANK ST STE 460WHITE PLAINS, NY 10606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF CONCEPTION, PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND ORGANIZATION OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOFTWARE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 6, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 8, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |