USPTO serial 75783737
AWESOME GIRLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AWESOME GIRLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Richmond Hill, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics, namely, nail polish, eye shadow, lip gloss, blush, body glitter; bath products, namely, bubble bath, foam bath and bath oils | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | create your own jewellery kits, embroidery and sequin craft kits; toy jewellery boxes; jewellery, namely, rings, necklaces and bracelets | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | toys, namely, dolls, beanbag dolls, articulated dolls, blow- molded dolls, doll accessories and fabric playsets; toy hair care products, namely, toy barrettes, toy headbands, toy combs, toy brushes, and toy mirrors; toy activity hobby and craft sets, namely, beading kits, create your own diary kits, scrap book kits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |