USPTO serial 75783841
PRIZMALITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRIZMALITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALBERT W HILBURGER
ALBERT W HILBURGER PERMAN & GREEN425 POST RDFAIRFIELD, CT 06430UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | MEN'S, WOMEN'S, AND CHILDREN'S APPAREL, NAMELY, OVERALLS, COATS, JACKETS, SUITS, GLOVES, MITTENS, CAPES, SHAWLS, SCARVES, ATHLETIC UNIFORMS, SLEEPWEAR, UNIFORMS, SHIRTS, AND PANTS, FOOTWEAR AND HEADWEAR TO WHICH MICRO-SIZED PARTICLES OF VARIOUS MATERIALS ARE APPLIED TO THE SURFACE THEREOF OR INTEGRATED INTO THE BULK THEREOF | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Innovative Concepts Unlimited, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Innovative Concepts Unlimited, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Prizmalite Industries Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named PRIZMALITE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 1, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 9, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |