USPTO serial 75784434
PERMALIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERMALIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark S. Graham
MARK S GRAHAM LUEDEKA NEELY & GRAHAM PCP O BOX 1871KNOXVILLE, TN 37901-1871UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Power-operated wastewater treatment machine parts, namely, chains, sprockets, flights, wear strips, wear shoes, and pins, all for use in waste water treatment facilities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |