Drawing for VITY BEAN

USPTO serial 75784468

VITY BEAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VITY BEAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRIAN P. MURPHY

BRIAN P MURPHY HOPGOOD, CALIMAFDE, KALIL & JUDLOWE LLP60 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10165-0006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005VITAMINS, DIETARY AND NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS AND CANDY CONTAINING VITAMINS, DIETARY AND NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 13, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 20, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 27, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 14, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 8, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 2, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 25, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 8, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance