USPTO serial 75784581
VALUE IN TECHNOLOGY INVESTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 6, 2001
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VALUE IN TECHNOLOGY INVESTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Levensohn Capital Management LLC
San Francisco, CA
Levensohn Capital Management LLC
San Francisco, CA
Levensohn Capital Management LLC
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark E. Miller
MARK E MILLER O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP275 BATTERY ST 26TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3305UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Investment Advisory services; funds and securities investment services namely direct investment services; publicly-traded equity investment management services; venture capital investment services; investment and financial portfolio management services; financial management services namely asset management services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 23, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Levensohn Capital Management LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Levensohn Capital Management LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Levensohn Capital Management LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named VALUE IN TECHNOLOGY INVESTING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 22, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |