USPTO serial 75784672
FULL CIRCLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FULL CIRCLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L Jolley
JENNIFER L JOLLEY SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATT1420 FIFTH AVE STE 3010SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | FROZEN AND NON-FROZEN PREPARED FOODS, NAMELY SOUPS, ENTREES, SIDE DISHES, AND APPETIZERS ALL CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF EGGS, CHEESE, FISH SEAFOOD, MEAT, POULTRY, FRUITS AND VEGETABLES, BREAD, PASTA, RICE, DAIRY PRODUCTS, NAMELY MILK, BUTTER, MARGARINE, YOGURT, CREAM, COTTAGE CHEESE, EGG SUBSTITUTES, ICE MILK, SOUR CREAM, ICE CREAM; FRUIT AND VEGETABLE BASED SPREADS AND SAUCES, JELLIES AND JAMS; COOKING AND SALAD OILS; PROCESSED EDIBLE SEEDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | PROCESSED CEREALS AND SNACK FOODS, NAMELY, POTATO, WHEAT, RICE AND VEGETABLE BASED SNACK FOODS; CONDIMENTS NAMELY, MUSTARD, KETCHUP, MAYONNAISE, RELISH; SAUCES; RICE AND PASTA; DESSERTS, NAMELY CONFECTIONS, ICE CREAM, FROZEN YOGURT, SHERBET, ICE CREAM BARS, CONES, POPSICLES, CANDY, PIES, CAKES, BARS, COOKIES, PUDDINGS, PASTRIES, GELATIN, TARTS, MOUSSES; COFFEE, TEA AND COCOA; CHOCOLATE; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR FOOD FLAVORINGS, SEASONINGS, HERBS AND SPICES, VINEGAR, BREAD AND BAKERY PRODUCTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | FRESH FRUITS AND VEGETABLES, DRIED AND CUT FLOWERS, LIVE FLOWERS AND PLANT SEEDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | SOFT DRINKS, FRUIT DRINKS AND FRUIT JUICES, VEGETABLE JUICES, MINERAL AND AERATED WATERS, SYRUPS AND OTHER PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING BEVERAGES, AND BEER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Earthworm, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named FULL CIRCLE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |