USPTO serial 75784700
SONG CENTRAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SONG CENTRAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PACIFIC PALISADES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
PACIFIC PALISADES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHANIE B. GLASER
LESLIE C RUITER STOKES LAWRENCE PS800 FIFTH AVE STE 4000SEATTLE, WA 98104-3179UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | On-line search engine, namely, providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for specialized song and lyric search, namely, searching songs and lyrics by song or lyric fragment, artist, tile, and by aesthetic criteria, namely, tempo, vocals, vibe, instruments, origin, era, and subjects; and compatible with various directory platforms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GLOBAL MUSIC OUTLET, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MOVISO LLC
- Other trademarks owned by GLOBAL MUSIC OUTLET, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SONG CENTRAL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |